|
Australian Motor Transport Supply Column in England: One of the men
wearing one of the rabbit-skin waistcoats presented by the Lady Mayoress
of Melbourne. From Page 22 of the Queenslander Pictorial, supplement to The Queenslander, 1 May, 1915 retrieved from http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/191568898 |
On 17 October 1914 an item appeared in the
Avoca Free Press announcing that 8,000 rabbit skins were being sought to supply to nurses who would sew them into jackets for use when working in the open. This request also appeared in many other newspapers
While it seems that the nurses would sew their own jackets, Melbourne's Lady Mayoress organised for jackets to be sewn for soldiers. The Echuca and Moama Advertiser and Farmers' Gazette
provided details of the design of rabbit skin jackets for the troops. At
least 18 rabbit skins would be needed to make a jacket.
The Argus of 27 October provided advice to boys about gathering rabbit skins
In 1917 the Commonwealth Government gazetted a regulation concerning rabbit skins under the War Precautions Act. Regulation 4 provided that:
All rabbit skins shall, unless the Prime Minister otherwise directs,
be forwarded to a Government Agent who shall, subject to these
Regulations, be authorized to purchase such skins on behalf of the
Commonwealth Government.
In 1918 the Hatters and Furriers Company Inc. of Connecticut, U.S.A. made a claim against the Australian Government for losses suffered as a result of having to pay more than initially contracted for rabbit skins supplied by Wilcox and Sons, an Australian firm. The
Australian Government Solicitor, George Shaw Knowles, was of the opinion that there was no liability of the Australian Government to pay compensation.
Australia was not alone in its use of rabbit skins. This German poster from 1917 is in the collection of Colombia University in the City of New York.
|
One of the posters from an exhibition at Columbia University in the City of New York: The European Home Front in WWI: Posters from the Frankenhuis Collection retrieved from http://news.columbia.edu/oncampus/3484 |
No comments:
Post a Comment